See what your public site says about your AI agent compliance posture.
Drop in a website URL and work email. We scan the public homepage for static signals, map the likely stack, and send a free report with the most likely EU AI Act, MiCA, and NIST gaps plus the Kakunin setup path.
Free report, not a generic lead form
The report highlights the detected ecosystem, the frameworks most likely in play, and a concrete next step to make the agent compliant using Kakunin.
- Detected AI stack and confidence level
- Likely EU AI Act, MiCA, and NIST relevance
- Suggested remediation path and docs links
- Immediate email follow-up for the prospect
How to read the score
The report estimates the risk of shipping an AI agent without a cryptographic identity certificate. Higher scores mean more exposure to impersonation, missing audit evidence, slower revocation, and weaker compliance proof.
- 0-49: low exposure, but identity proof still improves trust.
- 50-69: moderate exposure, especially for AI or enterprise workflows.
- 70-84: high exposure, worth remediating before launch.
- 85-100: critical exposure, certificate-first is the safer path.
What the heuristics look for
We only use public signals. The score rises when we see agent frameworks, regulated activity, or clear enterprise/compliance language, because those combinations tend to benefit most from an identity certificate.
The readout is a practical sales and compliance signal, not legal advice. The email report turns it into a concrete next step with Kakunin attestation guidance.